Treaty of Peace and Friendship, 8 Stat. 484 (1836), Still US Law | IACHR P-1365-26  ·  OHCHR h6a662eo | The Full Legal Record →
The official record of recognition

What the government put in writing, before and during the erasure

The most important evidence in this record is not what the government did to the treaty class. It is what the government wrote down about the treaty class while doing it. The admissions are the proof. They cannot be retracted. They are on the official record.

Eight times across 235 years, the official record confirmed who the treaty class was. Not a rumor. Not an interpretation. A statute, a court ruling, a Congressional record, or an international tribunal filing, each time placing the name on the books.

The sequence below runs in chronological order. Read the dates: the recognition and the reclassification were happening at the same time. That is not an accident. That is the record.

South Carolina
Moors Sundry Act, Moroccan subjects freed by name
Four years after the first Treaty of Peace and Friendship was signed, Moroccan subjects wrongly held in colonial enslavement petitioned the South Carolina Legislature. The Legislature passed a special law, the Moors Sundry Act, to free them and protect others in their situation. The act described them as "free born subjects of a Prince now in Alliance with the United States of America." That prince was the Sultan of Morocco. The state legislature of South Carolina recognized, in statutory law, that these were subjects of a sovereign empire protected by treaty.
Source: SC House Journal, 1790; SC Moors Sundry Act, 1790
Massachusetts
"Subjects of the Emperor of Morocco", in state law
The Massachusetts state legislature wrote "subjects of the Emperor of Morocco" into state law as a protected class. Massachusetts recognized the treaty class by the Emperor's title, not by a racial or color designation. This is the exact framing that the name chain was designed to replace. The year before the Constitution was ratified, Massachusetts already had state law recognizing Empire of Morocco subjects.
Source: Massachusetts General Court Act, 1788
Same Year, Same State
Recognition and reclassification in the same year
In 1790, South Carolina both recognized and reclassified the treaty class. The Legislature freed the Moors Sundry petitioners as "free born subjects of a Prince now in Alliance with the United States", while the first US Census, taken the same year, counted the same class as "free persons of color" instead of as nationals. Recognition and reclassification in the same year. Same people. Same state. The documentary evidence of both exists in the same year's official record.
Source: SC records; US Census 1790
US State Department
"The protection of native Moors rests on the Treaty of 1836"
US State Department correspondence confirmed in writing: "The protection of native Moors rests on the Treaty of 1836." This is a government legal opinion identifying the treaty class by name and identifying the legal basis for their protection. This document was in State Department files for decades before the 1959 Note claiming the treaty was "obsolete."
Source: US State Department, 1914
International Court of Justice
Highest international court confirms the treaty
The International Court of Justice at The Hague ruled in the Case Concerning Rights of Nationals of the United States of America in Morocco, explicitly ruling on rights "under the Treaty of 1836." The ICJ confirmed the treaty was real, in force, and created binding legal obligations. This ruling is part of the permanent international legal record.
Source: ICJ Reports 1952, Case Concerning Rights of Nationals of the United States in Morocco
US State Department
120 years of jurisdiction acknowledged, then stopped
In 1956, the US government formally acknowledged it had been exercising jurisdiction over "subjects of Morocco" on US soil for 120 years, since 1836. Then it stopped. Without adjudicating the status of a single individual. Without issuing the notice required by Article 25 of the treaty. Without following any procedure required by either the treaty or international law. The people whose status was being administered were not informed, consulted, or given any process.
Source: US State Department records, 1956; PL 856, 1956
Congressional Record
House Judiciary Chairman: "The Moroccans are the Indians"
Representative Emanuel Celler, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, the committee that writes US law, read General Guillaume's speech into the Congressional Record and stated: "I believe Guillaume was eminently right." Guillaume's statement: "The Moroccans are the Indians, the indigenous people." The chairman of the most powerful law-writing committee in the US Congress put this on the public record.
Source: Congressional Record, 1957; Guillaume speech
US Congress
H.Res.251: "The longest unbroken diplomatic relationship"
H.Res.251, introduced in the United States House of Representatives, March 25, 2025, states that the Treaty of Peace and Friendship "remains the longest unbroken diplomatic relationship in United States history." The co-sponsor of the resolution represents South Carolina, the same state that passed the Moors Sundry Act in 1790. The US legislative record contradicts the 1959 "obsolete" note and confirms the treaty has never been broken.
Source: H.Res.251, 119th Congress, 2025
Diplomatic admissions against interest

These are not endorsements. These are statements made by officials who were operating within the colonial framework, statements that supported the treaty class argument despite coming from within the framework that denied it. That is the definition of an admission against interest. The person making the statement had no incentive to support the claim, and said it anyway.

Diplomatic Admission, Israeli Consul General, Atlanta

Judith Varnai Shorer, Israeli Consul General, Atlanta (2016 IAC Conference)

"The major problem with Israel is with the young generation of the black community, Black Lives Matter starts there."

At the 2016 Israeli-American Council (IAC) conference, Israeli Consul General Judith Varnai Shorer stated: "The major problem with Israel is with the young generation of the black community, Black Lives Matter starts there." She then organized a private engagement with approximately 40 established Black community leaders, including Raphael Warnock, Vincent Fort, and Ceasar Mitchell, and distributed materials from Alan Dershowitz at the event. This is a diplomatic admission on two levels. First, the statement itself: Israel's own consul general identified the Black community in the United States as Israel's primary strategic concern, not a minor constituency, but the center of the diplomatic problem as Israel defined it. Second, the engagement: a consul general allocates official state resources. Organizing a formal dinner with 40 institutional Black leaders and distributing policy materials is official diplomatic conduct. That is a foreign sovereign's official recognition that the population classified as "Black American" has geopolitical weight that requires direct diplomatic management. The US government, which has treaty obligations to that same class, has not extended equivalent official recognition of their treaty status. Israel's diplomat recognized the significance. The treaty partner did not.

Source: 2016 Israeli-American Council (IAC) conference; reported in historical record
Congressional Record Admission, 1957

General A. Guillaume, "The Moroccans Are the Indians"

"The Moroccans are the Indians, the indigenous people."

General Guillaume's statement was read into the Congressional Record in 1957 by Rep. Emanuel Celler, Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, who stated "I believe Guillaume was eminently right." Guillaume was describing the relationship between the Moroccan population and the indigenous population of the Americas, not as a metaphor, but as a geographic and historical identification. He was confirming, on the US Congressional record, that the people called "Moroccan" and the people called "Indian" were the same population. The Chairman of the committee that writes US law endorsed it on the record. This was 1957. It is still on the Congressional Record.

Source: Congressional Record, 1957; Guillaume speech read by Rep. Celler
Senate Admission Against Interest, 2005

Senate Resolution 39 (2005), Lynching Apology

The Senate formally apologized for "its failure to enact anti-lynching legislation", acknowledging that 4,084 documented lynchings of "Black Americans" occurred with no federal prevention.

The EJI (Equal Justice Initiative) documented 4,084 racial terror lynchings between 1877 and 1950. Senate Resolution 39 acknowledged this record and the Senate's failure to prevent it. For the treaty class argument: the people lynched were classified as "Black Americans" under the domestic system. But as treaty class Moroccan subjects, each lynching without a consular official present was a violation of Article 21 of the 1836 Treaty. The Senate apologized for the domestic failure. The international law failure, the treaty violation, was not addressed. But the apology confirmed the harm. The treaty violation follows from the admission.

Source: US Senate Resolution 39, June 13, 2005
Congressional Admission, Education Suppression Confirmed

General Education Board Charter, 32 Stat. 769 (1903)

Frederick Gates (GEB, 1916): "We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or science. We are not to raise up from among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the germs of lawlessness or sharp-witted business man. He is to remain humble..."

The General Education Board was incorporated by Congressional charter in 1903 (32 Stat. 769) and funded by John D. Rockefeller. Its stated purpose was education. Its chairman's 1916 description of its mission explicitly excluded legal, political, and intellectual development for the population. The GEB document is not a private memo, it is the policy document of a Congressionally chartered institution. The Congress that chartered the GEB in 1903 chartered the mechanism that would systematically prevent the treaty class from learning the legal basis for their own rights. This is documented Congressional action that enabled the educational suppression architecture.

Source: GEB Occasional Papers, 1916; Congressional charter 32 Stat. 769, 1903
Vatican, Living Adverse Admission, 2023

Vatican Joint Statement (2023), Repudiation of the Doctrine of Discovery

The Vatican's 2023 joint statement from the Dicasteries for Culture and Education and for Promoting Integral Human Development repudiated the Doctrine of Discovery, the canonical legal framework that authorized the colonial seizure of indigenous land beginning with the papal bulls Inter Caetera (1493) and Dudum Siquidem (1493).

The papal bull Dudum Siquidem (1493) is the canonical root of Step 6 in the name chain, "Indian." The Vatican's document authorizing European colonizers to classify people as "Indians" and dispossess them is the same document that began the name chain. In 2023, the institution that issued Dudum Siquidem formally repudiated the legal framework it created. The Pope's own institution acknowledged that the canonical authorization for the colonial classification was illegitimate. Sublimis Deus (1537), issued 44 years after Dudum Siquidem, had already self-revoked the authorization, declaring that indigenous people "are not to be reduced to slavery." The 2023 statement is the living institutional confirmation that the canonical root of the name chain was always void.

Source: Vatican Dicasteries for Culture and Education and for Promoting Integral Human Development, Joint Statement on the Doctrine of Discovery, March 30, 2023
CERD Formal Acknowledgment, 2026

UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination, Early Warning Filing Acknowledged

The Early Warning filing to CERD was sent and formally acknowledged by the Committee on June 26, 2026, one day after submission.

CERD formal acknowledgment is not the same as a finding or a ruling. But formal acknowledgment by a UN treaty body means the submission was received and registered as a legitimate communication under the Committee's procedures. The CERD monitors compliance with the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, to which the United States is a party. When CERD acknowledges an Early Warning filing about the Empire of Morocco treaty class, it creates an official UN record that: (1) the matter has been formally submitted, (2) a treaty body with jurisdiction over racial discrimination against US-resident populations has registered the communication, (3) the US's compliance with ICERD is now specifically under observation with respect to the treaty class.

Source: CERD formal acknowledgment, June 26, 2026
What the comparison proves

Every claim the colonial narrative makes has a direct official document that contradicts it. The documents were there the whole time.

The admissions above — from the US Congress, the International Court of Justice, the Vatican, Israel's consul general, and the UN Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination — are drawn from the same official archive. That archive has always contained direct contradictions to the colonial narrative's foundational claims. What follows is the comparison.

What the colonial story says What the official documents say
"You have no national identity" The US exercised consular jurisdiction over "subjects of Morocco" on US soil until 1956, 120 years of official recognition of national identity
"You were brought here from Africa" Columbus's journal describes a mountain peak shaped like a mosque on his first day in Cuba (1492), the vocabulary of a man raised in Moorish Andalusia. Spain expelled Muslims from the colonies in 1539 and 1543. You cannot expel people who are not already there
"The treaty doesn't apply to you" H.Res.251 (2025): the US Congress calls the treaty "the longest unbroken diplomatic relationship in US history"
"You're African American, not Moroccan" The US State Department (1914): "The protection of native Moors rests on the Treaty of 1836"
"The 14th Amendment made you a citizen" The Expatriation Act, passed the same session as the 14th Amendment, confirmed that citizenship must be voluntary. The treaty class was denied both options simultaneously
"The treaty was ended in 1959" Article 25 requires 12 months written notice. That notice was never given. The US confirmed the treaty "unbroken" in 2025
"Native Americans and Black Americans are separate populations" Rep. Celler, Congressional Record (1957): "The Moroccans are the Indians, the indigenous people." The same population, classified in two boxes
See the documents that connect these records